Threats may be negative promises (but warnings are more than negative tips)

Wray, Helen and Wood, Jeffrey S. and Haigh, Matthew and Stewart, Andrew J. (2016) Threats may be negative promises (but warnings are more than negative tips). Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28 (5). pp. 593-600. ISSN 2044-5911

Full text not available from this repository.


In everyday situations conditional promises, threats, tips, and warnings are commonplace. Previous research has reported disruption to eye movements during reading when conditional promises are produced by someone who does not have control over the conditional outcome event, but no such disruption for the processing of conditional tips. In the present paper, we examine how readers process conditional threats and warnings. We compare one account which views conditional threats and warnings simply as promises and tips with negative outcomes, with an alternative account which highlights their broader pragmatic differences. In an eye-tracking experiment we find evidence suggesting that, in processing terms, while threats operate like negative promises, warnings are more than negative tips.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: C800 Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences > Dept. Psychology
Depositing User: Dr Panagiotis Rentzelas
Date Deposited: 20 Jun 2017 21:48
Last Modified: 01 Dec 2017 15:02

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


In this section...