Flood Risk Perception, Coping And Management In Two Vulnerable Communities In Kumasi, Ghana

Ahadzie, D.K. and Dinye, R.D. and Dinye, I. and Proverbs, David (2016) Flood Risk Perception, Coping And Management In Two Vulnerable Communities In Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 6 (3). pp. 538-549. ISSN 2041-9031

Preview

Text FLOOD RISK PERCEPTION, COPING AND MANAGEMENT IN TWO VULNERABLE COMMUNITIES IN KUMASI, GHANA.pdf - Published Version Download (636kB)

Abstract

Flooding has become an imminent and disruptive threat in many cities around the world. In developing/emerging economies, cities are often more vulnerable to the impacts of flooding. For example, in Accra, Ghana, recently over 150 people perished in a flash flood. The high casualty rate was a consequence of the lack of a well-developed integrated flood risk management plan and exacerbated by weak institutions, slums, urban sprawl and informal land / property management. To this effect, high risk countries like Ghana are in need of urgent development of systematic mitigation measures to engender community resilience (CS). Using the combined qualitative technique of Phenomenological Studies (PS) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), the flood risk perception, coping and management strategies of two vulnerable communities in the second largest city of Ghana, Kumasi are examined and evaluated for evidence of a sense of community resilience through social responsibility. The findings suggest that the two urban communities are aware they are at high risk to flooding and live in a constant state of anxiety during the wet seasons. However, there is no evidence of any systematic coping and management strategies and the communities feel there is nothing they can do without government support. It is suggested that government should use the leverage of local government practices to help engender a stronger sense of community empowerment and involvement towards building resilient communities that can respond to flooding through perceptions, social responsibility and appropriate public relation models.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	COPYRIGHT WIT PRESS
Identification Number:	https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N3-538-549
Dates:	Date Event 2016 Published
Subjects:	CAH13 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01-01 - architecture CAH13 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01-02 - building CAH13 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01-04 - planning (urban, rural and regional)
Divisions:	Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment > School of Engineering and the Built Environment Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment > School of Engineering and the Built Environment > Dept. of Built Environment
Depositing User:	Ian Mcdonald
Date Deposited:	04 Aug 2017 15:07
Last Modified:	22 Mar 2023 12:16
URI:	https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4948

Actions (login required)

View Item