Mastering the Art of Scoping Reviews: A Comprehensive Guide for Public Health and Allied Health Students
Kabir, Russell and Parsa, Ali Davod and Syed, Haniya Zehra and Bai, Ancy Chandrababu Mercy and Hussain, Remsha and Khan, Muhammad Feroz and Parvin, Sauda and Vinnakota, Divya and Sathian, Brijesh and Sivasubramanian, Madhini and Banerjee, Indrajit and Chowdhury, Mohammad Rocky Khan and Mohammadnezhad, Masoud and Arafat, S.M Yasir and Aaqib, Muhammad and Marthoenis, M and Husain, Syed Shajee and Hayhoe, Richard (2024) Mastering the Art of Scoping Reviews: A Comprehensive Guide for Public Health and Allied Health Students. Asian Journal of Public Health and Nursing, 1 (2). ISSN 3064-0008
Preview |
Text
AJPHN+16+Kabir.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (402kB) |
Abstract
Background: Scoping reviews systematically map the breadth of evidence on a particular topic, providing a comprehensive overview of the available research. This paper aims to outline the key steps involved in conducting a scoping review and to provide practical guidance for public health and allied health students and researchers. Methods: Formulating a research question using the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framework to develop a clear research question or objective. Setting inclusion and exclusion criteria to guide the selection of studies for inclusion in the review. Conducting a thorough search across relevant databases and sources, including both academic and grey literature. Using a PRISMA flow diagram to document the search and selection process. Extracting and charting relevant data from included studies. Analysing synthesizing data using descriptive analysis or basic qualitative content analysis. Summarizing and presenting findings in a clear and meaningful way. Results: The paper provides a detailed guide for conducting scoping reviews, emphasizing the differences between scoping reviews and systematic reviews. It highlights that scoping reviews address broader research questions and typically do not assess study quality. Practical guidance is provided on developing search strategies and creating data extraction forms. Conclusions: This paper serves as a comprehensive guide for public health and allied health students and researchers undertaking scoping reviews, covering key methodological considerations and best practices throughout the review process.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Identification Number: | 10.62377/j544ed47 |
Dates: | Date Event 31 July 2024 Accepted 5 August 2024 Published Online |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Scoping Review, Steps, Guide, Public Health |
Subjects: | CAH02 - subjects allied to medicine > CAH02-04 - nursing and midwifery > CAH02-04-01 - nursing (non-specific) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences > College of Nursing and Midwifery |
Depositing User: | Gemma Tonks |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2025 14:03 |
Last Modified: | 12 Feb 2025 14:03 |
URI: | https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/16157 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |