Barriers, Bottlenecks, and Challenges in Implementing Safety I- and Safety II-Enabled Safe Systems of Working in Construction Projects: A Scoping Review

Sarvari, Hadi and Edwards, David J. and Rillie, Iain and Roberts, Chris (2025) Barriers, Bottlenecks, and Challenges in Implementing Safety I- and Safety II-Enabled Safe Systems of Working in Construction Projects: A Scoping Review. Buildings, 15 (3). p. 347. ISSN 2075-5309

[thumbnail of buildings-15-00347-v2.pdf]
Preview
Text
buildings-15-00347-v2.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB)

Abstract

The construction industry has endured high incident rates for many decades. Although multiple safety measures in the form of Safety I- and II-enabled safe systems of working (SSoWs) have been implemented, statistics reveal that a significant prevalence of incidents prevails worldwide. However, there is limited information available about the actual factors that are impeding these SSoWs. This study investigates and evaluates the barriers, bottlenecks and challenges (BB&Cs) that hinder the implementation of Safety I- and II-enabled SSoWs in the construction industry. Using a scoping review methodology, a thorough search of articles documenting the BB&Cs of implementing Safety I- and II-enabled SSoWs was carried out using Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. An initiative model was employed for categorising BB&C to implement Safety I and II, which includes micro- (site), meso- (organisation), and macro (environment)-thematic groupings, as a guiding framework for the mapping and analysis of results. The search yielded 98 articles that discussed the implementation of Safety I and II, with 54 of them specifically related to BB&Cs. Emergent results emphasised how there is scant literature on the BB&Cs of implementation Safety I- and II-enabled SSoWs across site, organisation and environment levels. Extensive global research is necessary to comprehensively understand the obstacles to implementing Safety I and II in practice as a first step towards reducing incidents and accidents on site. Cumulatively, the findings suggest that implementing Safety I- and II-enabled SSoWs should be based on removing BB&Cs and evaluating how they affect safety performance.

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: 10.3390/buildings15030347
Dates:
Date
Event
21 January 2025
Accepted
23 January 2025
Published Online
Uncontrolled Keywords: Safety I, Safety II, safety plan, safety system, barriers
Subjects: CAH13 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01 - architecture, building and planning > CAH13-01-02 - building
Divisions: Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment > College of Built Environment
Depositing User: Gemma Tonks
Date Deposited: 04 Mar 2025 16:16
Last Modified: 04 Mar 2025 16:16
URI: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/16202

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Research

In this section...