Early Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Polytrauma Patients Using Balanced Random Forest ML: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Hassine, Nesrine Ben El Hadj and Barbaria, Sabri and Najah, Omayma and Ceylan, Halil İbrahim and Bilal, Muhammad and Rebai, Lotfi and Muntean, Raul Ioan and Dergaa, Ismail and Boussi Rahmouni, Hanene (2025) Early Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Polytrauma Patients Using Balanced Random Forest ML: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14 (24). p. 8934. ISSN 2077-0383

[thumbnail of jcm-14-08934-v2.pdf]
Preview
Text
jcm-14-08934-v2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents a critical complication in polytrauma patients, characterized by diffuse lung inflammation and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates with mortality rates reaching 45% in intensive care units (ICU). The heterogeneous nature of ARDS and complex clinical presentation in severely injured patients poses substantial diagnostic challenges, necessitating early prediction tools to guide timely interventions. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for clinical decision support, demonstrating superior performance compared to traditional scoring systems in capturing complex patterns within high-dimensional medical data. Based on the identified research gaps in early ARDS prediction for polytrauma populations, our study aimed to: (i) develop a balanced random forest (BRF) ML model for early ARDS prediction in critically ill polytrauma patients, (ii) identify the most predictive clinical features using ANOVA-based feature selection, and (iii) evaluate model performance using comprehensive metrics addressing class imbalance challenges. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 407 polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU of the Center of Traumatology and Major Burns of Ben Arous, Tunisia, between 2017 and 2021. We implemented a comprehensive ML pipeline that incorporates Tomek Links undersampling, ANOVA F-test feature selection for the top 10 predictive variables, and SMOTE oversampling with a conservative sampling rate of 0.3. The BRF classifier was trained with class weighting and evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included AUROC, PR-AUC, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient. Results: Among 407 patients, 43 developed ARDS according to the Berlin definition, representing a 10.57% incidence. The BRF model demonstrated exceptional predictive performance with an AUROC of 0.98, a sensitivity of 0.91, a specificity of 0.80, an F1-score of 0.84, and an MCC of 0.70. Precision–recall AUC reached 0.86, demonstrating robust performance despite class imbalance. During stratified cross-validation, AUROC values ranged from 0.93 to 0.99 across folds, indicating consistent model stability. The top 10 selected features included procalcitonin, PaO2 at ICU admission, 24-h pH, massive transfusion, total fluid resuscitation, presence of pneumothorax, alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary contusion, hemothorax, and flail chest injury. Conclusions: Our BRF model provides a robust, clinically applicable tool for early prediction of ARDS in polytrauma patients using readily available clinical parameters. The comprehensive two-step resampling approach, combined with ANOVA-based feature selection, successfully addressed class imbalance while maintaining high predictive accuracy. These findings support integrating ML approaches into critical care decision-making to improve patient outcomes and resource allocation. External validation in diverse populations remains essential for confirming generalizability and clinical implementation.

Item Type: Article
Identification Number: 10.3390/jcm14248934
Dates:
Date
Event
9 December 2025
Accepted
17 December 2025
Published Online
Uncontrolled Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS prediction, balanced random forest, class imbalance, feature selection, intensive care unit, ML, polytrauma, predictive modeling, SMOTE
Subjects: CAH17 - business and management > CAH17-01 - business and management > CAH17-01-04 - management studies
Divisions: Architecture, Built Environment, Computing and Engineering > Engineering
Depositing User: Gemma Tonks
Date Deposited: 02 Sep 2026 12:12
Last Modified: 02 Sep 2026 12:12
URI: https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17209

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Research

In this section...