Challenges in advising people with severe mental illness to quit smoking: A conversation analysis of patient resistance

Yang, Xinxin and Begh, Rachna and Lindson, Nicola and Albury, Charlotte and Barnes, Rebecca and Dyson, Judith and Morrison, Leanne and Bradbury, Katherine and Molodynski, Andrew and Coleman, Tim and Naughton, Felix and Kirk, Megan and Pokhrel, Subhash and Johnston, Gordon and Peckham, Emily and Knight, Ethan and Joyce, Jack B. (2026) Challenges in advising people with severe mental illness to quit smoking: A conversation analysis of patient resistance. Patient Education and Counseling, 150. p. 109744. ISSN 0738-3991

Preview

Text Challenges_in_Advising_People_with_Severe_Mental_Illness_to_Quit_Smoking_A_Conversation_Analysis_of_Patient_Resistance.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (456kB)

Abstract

Objectives
People experiencing severe mental illness (SMI) smoke at rates 2.5 times higher than the general population and have a reduced lifespan by 15–20 years, causing substantial health inequalities. This study examined how people with SMI resisted smoking cessation advice, delivered by primary care clinicians (general practitioners and nurses) during routine annual health reviews.
Methods
Using conversation analysis (CA), we analysed 56 audio-recorded consultations from a randomised controlled trial of annual health reviews in which smoking cessation advice was discussed. We identified a core collection of 21 instances of patient resistance and conducted detailed sequential analysis to examine how resistance to smoking cessation advice was expressed, and how clinicians responded.
Results
Analysis revealed two distinct patterns of resistance to smoking cessation advice: implicit rejection and explicit rejection. In implicit rejection sequences, patients foreground mental health concerns, thereby indicating that quitting cannot be acted upon at the moment. In explicit rejection sequences, patients rejected the advice with an explicit ‘no’ and expressed indifference to the health risks of smoking, presenting smoking as non-negotiable and making further discussion redundant. In both scenarios, clinicians responded with acknowledgements (e.g. “mm”, “yeah”, or “okay” indicating receipt and alignment), neither explicitly agreeing with the patient nor pushing back on their resistance.
Conclusions
Addressing smoking-related health inequalities among people with SMI is challenging because quitting is often deprioritised in the context of competing mental health and social concerns. These difficulties are compounded by clinicians’ challenges in raising and sustaining smoking cessation discussions. Recognising how resistance to quitting advice is interactionally produced can support more flexible and tailored cessation approaches that better align with patients’ priorities.
Practice implications
This study highlights the unique resistance sequence presented in consultations advising people with SMI to quit smoking. It provides implications for clinical professionals to adopt more responsive and tailored responses to the resistance.

Item Type:	Article
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.pec.2026.109744
Dates:	Date Event 11 June 2026 Accepted 16 June 2026 Published Online
Uncontrolled Keywords:	severe mental illness, reduce smoking, quit smoking, resistance, conversation analysis
Subjects:	CAH02 - subjects allied to medicine > CAH02-04 - nursing and midwifery > CAH02-04-02 - adult nursing
Divisions:	Nursing and Midwifery > Adult Nursing
Depositing User:	Gemma Tonks
Date Deposited:	15 Sep 2026 10:12
Last Modified:	15 Sep 2026 10:12
URI:	https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17244

Actions (login required)

View Item