This study investigated the effects of two separate doses of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) on 4 km time trial (TT) cycling performance and post-exercise acid base balance recovery in hypoxia. Fourteen club-level cyclists completed four cycling TT’s, followed by a 40 min passive recovery in normobaric hypoxic conditions (FiO2 = 14.5%) following one of either: two doses of NaHCO3 (0.2 g.kg−1 BM; SBC2, or 0.3 g.kg−1 BM; SBC3), a taste-matched placebo (0.07 g.kg−1 BM sodium chloride; PLA), or a control trial in a double-blind, randomized, repeated-measures and crossover design study. Compared to PLA, TT performance was improved following SBC2 (p = 0.04, g = 0.16, very likely beneficial), but was improved to a greater extent following SBC3 (p = 0.01, g = 0.24, very likely beneficial). Furthermore, a likely benefit of ingesting SBC3 over SBC2 was observed (p = 0.13, g = 0.10), although there was a large inter-individual variation. Both SBC treatments achieved full recovery within 40 min, which was not observed in either PLA or CON following the TT. In conclusion, NaHCO3 improves 4 km TT performance and acid base balance recovery in acute moderate hypoxic conditions, however the optimal dose warrants an individual approach.
106
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
Altmetric
Physiology and Nutrition
The effects of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on cycling performance and acid base balance recovery in acute normobaric hypoxia
Lewis A. Gough Sport and Physical Activity Department, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UKCorrespondencelewis.gough@bcu.ac.uk
, Sanjoy K. Deb Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Life Sciences Department, University of Westminster, London, UK
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-8224
, Danny Brown Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK, S. Andy Sparks Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK & Lars R. McNaughton Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Department of Sport and Movement Studies, Faculty of Health Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Lewis A. Gough Sport and Physical Activity Department, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UKCorrespondencelewis.gough@bcu.ac.uk
, Sanjoy K. Deb Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Life Sciences Department, University of Westminster, London, UK
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-8224
, Danny Brown Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK, S. Andy Sparks Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK & Lars R. McNaughton Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Department of Sport and Movement Studies, Faculty of Health Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
, Sanjoy K. Deb Sports Nutrition and Performance Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK; Life Sciences Department, University of Westminster, London, UK


Accepted 18 Dec 2018
Published online: 22 Jan 2019
People also read
Lewis J. James et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Volume 19, 2019 - Issue 1
Published online: 31 Oct 2018
Daniel J. Owens et al.
European Journal of Sport Science
Volume 19, 2019 - Issue 1
Published online: 15 Aug 2018