Public perceptions of the effectiveness of income provision on reducing psychological distress
Bridger, Emma K. and Nettle, Daniel (2022) Public perceptions of the effectiveness of income provision on reducing psychological distress. Journal of Public Mental Health. ISSN 1746-5729
|
Text
Accepted PDF_Proof Publicperceptions.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (350kB) |
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to understand public perceptions of the role of income for improving mental health, since public perceptions shape political decision-making. Socioeconomic determinants such as poverty cause a great deal of mental ill-health, yet it is not clear whether the general public believes this to be true. Lay understandings of health often overemphasize the roles of individual habits and medical treatments and underappreciate the importance of socioeconomic determinants.
Design/methodology/approach. UK adults (n = 622) rated effectiveness of three interventions for reducing psychological distress: medication, psychotherapy, and providing sufficient income to cover necessities via a basic income. We manipulated whether participants rated effectiveness for an identified individual vs. the population in general. Participants also indicated their support for the introduction of the basic income scheme.
Findings. Increasing income was rated highly effective for reducing psychological distress. Effectiveness ratings for income provision were as high as those for psychotherapy, and higher than those for medication. There was also an interaction with framing: in the population framing, income provision was rated more effective than either of the other two interventions. There were high levels of support for introducing a universal basic income scheme in this population.
Originality. UK adults anticipate that income provision would be highly effective at reducing psychological distress; as or more effective than increasing access to psychotherapy or medication. Policymakers can assume that the public will be receptive to arguments for mental health interventions that tackle broader socioeconomic determinants, especially when these are framed in population terms.
| Item Type: | Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-04-2022-0036 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Psychological distress, lay perceptions, public mental health, basic income | ||||||
| Subjects: | CAH04 - psychology > CAH04-01 - psychology > CAH04-01-01 - psychology (non-specific) CAH15 - social sciences > CAH15-03 - politics > CAH15-03-01 - politics |
||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences > Dept. Psychology | ||||||
| Depositing User: | Emma Bridger | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 24 Jun 2022 13:39 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 24 Jun 2022 13:39 | ||||||
| URI: | https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13262 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Tools
Tools