Accrediting digital forensics: what are the choices?

Sommer, Peter (2018) Accrediting digital forensics: what are the choices? Digital Investigation, 25. pp. 116-120.

[img] Text (Digital Forensics Standards)
Accrediting digital forensics.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 April 2020.

Download (587kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

There are three apparent competing routes to providing re-assurance about the quality of digital forensics work: accredit the individual expert, accredit the laboratory and its processes, let the courts test via its procedures. The strengths and weaknesses of each are discussed against the variety of activities within “forensic science”. The particular problems of digital forensics, including its complexity and rate of change, are reviewed. It is argued that formal standards may not always be practical or value for money compared with advisory good practice guides.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: F400 Forensic and Archaeological Science
G400 Computer Science
G500 Information Systems
L400 Social Policy
M900 Other in Law
Divisions: Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment
Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment > School of Computing and Digital Technology > Cyber Security
UoA Collections > REF2021 UoA11: Computer Science and Informatics
Depositing User: Peter Sommer
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2018 13:49
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2018 13:28
URI: http://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6008

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Research

In this section...