Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys
Tecwyn, Emma C and Denison, Stephanie and Messer, Emily JE and Buchsbaum, Daphna (2016) Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition.
![]() |
Text
Tecwyn et al_AnimalCognition_Accepted version.docx - Accepted Version Download (164kB) |
Abstract
The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2-3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Dates: | Date Event 7 October 2016 Accepted 15 October 2016 Published Online |
Subjects: | CAH04 - psychology > CAH04-01 - psychology > CAH04-01-01 - psychology (non-specific) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences > College of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Emma Tecwyn |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2019 15:13 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jun 2024 13:03 |
URI: | https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/6853 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |