Creative contagion or missing story? – examining the REF archives for evidence of provision for creative practice in doctoral study

Vaughan, Sian (2025) Creative contagion or missing story? – examining the REF archives for evidence of provision for creative practice in doctoral study. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education. ISSN 2398-4686

Preview

Text AAM_version_SGPE_Creative_contagion_.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (312kB)

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate whether there is evidence that tailored provision for creative practice was spreading across disciplines in the UK during the period 2014–2020. In doing so, the author examined the potential and limitations of the archives of a national research assessment exercise as a source for understanding perceived priorities in doctoral provision during a period of recent history.

Design/methodology/approach

This study examined descriptions of doctoral provision in the research environment statements that formed part of the publicly available submissions to the, 2021 research excellence framework (REF). Aligning with meta-research and historical discourse analysis approaches, the study involved a close reading and critical analysis of a small sample of documents across four different disciplinary areas.

Findings

In creative disciplines, tailored support was identified for creative practice in practice research. There was a lack of discussion of such provision in other disciplines, including in education research where arts-based methods are used. This study demonstrates the limitations and challenges of using the REF archives to understand the history of doctoral provision. Only qualified interpretations can be made about actual institutional practice, revealing more about perspectives on the relative importance of different facets of doctoral provision.

Originality/value

The research is novel in investigating the potential of discipline level REF research environment statements as sources for research into discourse on doctoral education. In identifying evidence for tailored provision and the missing stories of this spreading to other disciplines, it challengesthe author to consider the support requirements for creative practice appropriate to the doctoral education contexts.

Item Type:	Article
Identification Number:	10.1108/SGPE-10-2024-0107
Dates:	Date Event 30 January 2025 Accepted 5 March 2025 Published Online
Uncontrolled Keywords:	research assessment, research environment, practice research, creative methods, art based, doctoral provision
Subjects:	CAH22 - education and teaching > CAH22-01 - education and teaching > CAH22-01-01 - education CAH25 - design, and creative and performing arts > CAH25-01 - creative arts and design > CAH25-01-02 - art
Divisions:	Faculty of Arts, Design and Media > College of Art and Design
Depositing User:	Gemma Tonks
Date Deposited:	10 Mar 2025 15:23
Last Modified:	10 Mar 2025 15:23
URI:	https://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/id/eprint/16226

Actions (login required)

View Item